misc.fitness.weights

on FitnessDiscussions.com

  Home  |  Books  |  Fitness.Weights Newsgroup  |  Resources  |  Contact  | 
Sign in
username:

password:

Remember Me

Not a member?
Search misc.fitness.weights

Search Tips

misc.fitness.weights -> Circumcision (it is about time for a thread)

There are 51 messages in this thread.
You are currently looking at messages 1 to 20.






Author: Joe Humble
Date: 10:46 19-02-06

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060218/ts_afp/healthuscircumcision

Apparently a father is standing up to the circumcision mafia. With so
many kinds no longer being cut, I'd assume this need not be an
emotional trial. The data should be pretty straightforward by now.

At 60% one can hardly make the "outcast" argument anymore either. It
should be decided straight up on the epidemiological data.


--
Is this thing on?

Date: 11:08 19-02-06


On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 15:46:23 GMT, Joe Humble <joehumble@earthlink.net>
wrote:

>http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060218/ts_afp/healthuscircumcision
>
>Apparently a father is standing up to the circumcision mafia. With so
>many kinds no longer being cut, I'd assume this need not be an
>emotional trial. The data should be pretty straightforward by now.
>
>At 60% one can hardly make the "outcast" argument anymore either. It
>should be decided straight up on the epidemiological data.

Why are my legs crossed funny as I read that?

Author: David Cohen
Date: 13:19 19-02-06


"Joe Humble" <joehumble@earthlink.net> wrote
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060218/ts_afp/healthuscircumcision
>
> Apparently a father is standing up to the circumcision mafia. With so
> many kinds no longer being cut, I'd assume this need not be an
> emotional trial. The data should be pretty straightforward by now.

Real men aren't afraid to have to tip of their penis, or their son's,
whacked off.

But eight YEARS old? WTF?! Eight DAYS! Jews and Moslems do it at eight DAYS!
Who the fuck waits eight years?

David



Author: OmManiPadmeOmelet
Date: 13:50 19-02-06

In article <iF2Kf.770$S25.177@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
"David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote:

> "Joe Humble" <joehumble@earthlink.net> wrote
> > http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060218/ts_afp/healthuscircumcision
> >
> > Apparently a father is standing up to the circumcision mafia. With so
> > many kinds no longer being cut, I'd assume this need not be an
> > emotional trial. The data should be pretty straightforward by now.
>
> Real men aren't afraid to have to tip of their penis, or their son's,
> whacked off.
>
> But eight YEARS old? WTF?! Eight DAYS! Jews and Moslems do it at eight DAYS!
> Who the fuck waits eight years?
>
> David
>
>

I thought that traditionally, jews did it at 12 years?

Bar mitzvah?
--
Peace, Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack
Nicholson

Author: David Cohen
Date: 14:46 19-02-06


"OmManiPadmeOmelet" <Omelet@brokenegz.com> wrote
> "David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> "Joe Humble" <joehumble@earthlink.net> wrote
>> > http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060218/ts_afp/healthuscircumcision
>> >
>> > Apparently a father is standing up to the circumcision mafia. With so
>> > many kinds no longer being cut, I'd assume this need not be an
>> > emotional trial. The data should be pretty straightforward by now.
>>
>> Real men aren't afraid to have to tip of their penis, or their son's,
>> whacked off.
>>
>> But eight YEARS old? WTF?! Eight DAYS! Jews and Moslems do it at eight
>> DAYS!
>> Who the fuck waits eight years?
>
> I thought that traditionally, jews did it at 12 years?

You thought Jews cut off the tips of their dicks at 12 years?!? Oy, such a
schlemeel...

> Bar mitzvah?

Yeah, ya' think?

David



Author: W. Bacon
Date: 14:55 19-02-06

It astounds me that this form of child mutilation is still legal.


Author: OmManiPadmeOmelet
Date: 14:55 19-02-06

In article <qW3Kf.815$S25.342@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
"David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote:

> "OmManiPadmeOmelet" <Omelet@brokenegz.com> wrote
> > "David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >> "Joe Humble" <joehumble@earthlink.net> wrote
> >> > http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060218/ts_afp/healthuscircumcision
> >> >
> >> > Apparently a father is standing up to the circumcision mafia. With
so
> >> > many kinds no longer being cut, I'd assume this need not be an
> >> > emotional trial. The data should be pretty straightforward by now.
> >>
> >> Real men aren't afraid to have to tip of their penis, or their son's,
> >> whacked off.
> >>
> >> But eight YEARS old? WTF?! Eight DAYS! Jews and Moslems do it at eight
> >> DAYS!
> >> Who the fuck waits eight years?
> >
> > I thought that traditionally, jews did it at 12 years?
>
> You thought Jews cut off the tips of their dicks at 12 years?!? Oy, such a
> schlemeel...
>
> > Bar mitzvah?
>
> Yeah, ya' think?
>
> David
>
>

Seemed a bit cruel... ;-)
Glad it ain't so!
--
Peace, Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack
Nicholson

Author: John
Date: 18:31 19-02-06

"W. Bacon" <withbacon@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1140378927.198954.136500@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> It astounds me that this form of child mutilation is still legal.

You don't need it. It's like removing unsightly back hair. It's better that
way.



Author: John
Date: 18:31 19-02-06

"Joe Humble" <joehumble@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:kd4hv1dr777o66j213atrk2tdpv4vs031p@4ax.com...
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060218/ts_afp/healthuscircumcision
>
> Apparently a father is standing up to the circumcision mafia. With so
> many kinds no longer being cut, I'd assume this need not be an
> emotional trial. The data should be pretty straightforward by now.
>
> At 60% one can hardly make the "outcast" argument anymore either. It
> should be decided straight up on the epidemiological data.

You're kidding, right? If you're cut, go to England and have sex with one of
the flat assed women. They'll be pleasantly surprised that your cut. Most
women, here or abroad, prefer a man without the bacteria harboring useless
piece of skin.



Author: DZ
Date: 19:40 19-02-06

W. Bacon <withbacon@aol.com> wrote:
> It astounds me that this form of child mutilation is still legal.

It astounds me that sex for procreation is still legal. Who all those
people think they are to decide for a child to be mutilated into
existence (aka "born")?

Author: rmr
Date: 14:18 21-02-06

On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:19:58 GMT, "David Cohen"
<sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote:

>But eight YEARS old? WTF?! Eight DAYS! Jews and Moslems do it at eight DAYS!
>Who the fuck waits eight years?

They do it at 8 days because babies are too young to defend
themselves.

Ray

Author: Steve Sullivan
Date: 14:55 21-02-06

"rmr" <> >> They do it at 8 days because babies are too young to
defend
> themselves.
>

At the Holy Mother of Cornucopia Orphanage the priests used to wait until
the boys were about 12 before they would decide who would get circumcised.

I remember the night Father O'Malley asked me into his room so that he could
perform the sacred test.

After I took the holy host in my mouth, he took me to the rectory and showed
all the other priests.

Then they took turns making sure that I had the entire Holy Spirit into me.
The next day when I woke up my foreskin was gone. I was told that is what
they use to make the holy wafers for communion.



Date: 16:56 21-02-06

On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 19:18:58 GMT, rmr <news@rmns.co.python.uk> wrote:

>They do it at 8 days because babies are too young to defend
>themselves.
>
>Ray

I kicked the Dr's ass when he tried it on me. Imagine being beaten
senseless by a 3 minute old baby...

Date: 16:58 21-02-06

On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 19:55:28 GMT, "Steve Sullivan"
<sullivan@ierie.com> wrote:

>At the Holy Mother of Cornucopia Orphanage the priests used to wait until
>the boys were about 12 before they would decide who would get circumcised.
>
>I remember the night Father O'Malley asked me into his room so that he could
>perform the sacred test.
>
>After I took the holy host in my mouth, he took me to the rectory and showed
>all the other priests.
>
>Then they took turns making sure that I had the entire Holy Spirit into me.
>The next day when I woke up my foreskin was gone. I was told that is what
>they use to make the holy wafers for communion.
>

I had a similar experience, except when I woke up the next day my ass
was sore, and I walked funny for a week.

Author: Steve Sullivan
Date: 17:25 21-02-06

<GreggValentino@> I had a similar experience, except when I woke up the next
day my ass was sore, and I walked funny for a week.>>

You must have received the Sacred Confirmation ritual.

Unfortunately I was dropped from the program at the age of 11 when I got VD
and Father O'Malley claimed it was from an non-rectory experience. He said
the Pope would excommunicate me if he found out. I was given a small stipend
and sent packing.



Date: 17:47 21-02-06

On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:25:36 GMT, "Steve Sullivan"
<sullivan@ierie.com> wrote:


>You must have received the Sacred Confirmation ritual.
>

Actually they called it the "big-royal Sacred confirmation ritual". My
memory is hazy from the drug induced blackouts, but I'm pretty sure
"The King" was there too, but suffered from impotency. It was before
he got the Burger King gigs, and he couldn't afford Viagra, and had
self-image issues.

>Unfortunately I was dropped from the program at the age of 11 when I got VD
>and Father O'Malley claimed it was from an non-rectory experience. He said
>the Pope would excommunicate me if he found out. I was given a small stipend
>and sent packing.
>
I got VD to, but it was from riding a tractor.

Author: Dally
Date: 18:19 21-02-06

rmr wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:19:58 GMT, "David Cohen"
> <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>>But eight YEARS old? WTF?! Eight DAYS! Jews and Moslems do it at eight DAYS!
>>Who the fuck waits eight years?
>
>
> They do it at 8 days because babies are too young to defend
> themselves.

Or to allow clotting factors to become established.

Dally

Author: David Cohen
Date: 20:18 21-02-06


"Dally" <Dally@myself.com> wrote
> rmr wrote:
>> "David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>But eight YEARS old? WTF?! Eight DAYS! Jews and Moslems do it at eight
>>>DAYS! Who the fuck waits eight years?
>>
>> They do it at 8 days because babies are too young to defend
>> themselves.
>
> Or to allow clotting factors to become established.

Or, just maybe, they've been doing it that way for five thousand years?

Nah! Too obvious. It's the "clotting factors becoming established".

David




Author: Dally
Date: 22:55 21-02-06

David Cohen wrote:

> "Dally" <Dally@myself.com> wrote
>
>>rmr wrote:
>>
>>> "David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>But eight YEARS old? WTF?! Eight DAYS! Jews and Moslems do it at eight
>>>>DAYS! Who the fuck waits eight years?
>>>
>>>They do it at 8 days because babies are too young to defend
>>>themselves.
>>
>>Or to allow clotting factors to become established.
>
>
> Or, just maybe, they've been doing it that way for five thousand years?
>
> Nah! Too obvious. It's the "clotting factors becoming established".

David, I've been reading science news all my life marvelling about how
science is figuring out what my Jewish grandmother already knew.

We've been doing it this way for five thousand years because semites
figured out that it was better not to have the kid bleed to death and
that happened less if you waited until the 8th day. So clotting factors
could become established.

Now they give all the little goyim Vitamin K injections before they snip
them as neonates.

Our way is better. You get clotting factors AND a prayer.

Dally

Author: David Cohen
Date: 00:07 22-02-06


"Dally" <Dally@myself.com> wrote
> David Cohen wrote:
>> "Dally" <Dally@myself.com> wrote
>>>rmr wrote:
>>>> "David Cohen" <sammiesdad@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>But eight YEARS old? WTF?! Eight DAYS! Jews and Moslems do it at
eight
>>>>>DAYS! Who the fuck waits eight years?
>>>>
>>>>They do it at 8 days because babies are too young to defend
>>>>themselves.
>>>
>>>Or to allow clotting factors to become established.
>>
>> Or, just maybe, they've been doing it that way for five thousand years?
>>
>> Nah! Too obvious. It's the "clotting factors becoming established".
>
> David, I've been reading science news all my life marvelling about how
> science is figuring out what my Jewish grandmother already knew.

Indeed. Just google "antiviral" and "chicken soup".

> We've been doing it this way for five thousand years because semites
> figured out that it was better not to have the kid bleed to death and that
> happened less if you waited until the 8th day. So clotting factors could
> become established.

Most biblical stuff, like kosher laws, had some evolutionary advantage.

> Now they give all the little goyim Vitamin K injections before they snip
> them as neonates.
>
> Our way is better. You get clotting factors AND a prayer.

Mazel tov!

David



1 2 3


      Contact  |  Fitness


misc.fitness.weights by Keywords
Alcohol
Arnold
Bodybuilding
Bodyfat
Bowflex
Creatine
Deadlift
Ephedra
HST
Hypertrophy
Kettlebell
Powerlifting
Protein
Pullups
Pushups
Resistance
Sheiko
Squat
Steroids
Supplements
Testosterone
Video
Vitamin

misc.fitness.weights By Author